Peer Review Proccess
Peer Review Process
The article which comes to our editorial site would be a review on technical aspects that have been stated in author guidelines and would be check for originality as well as the other aspect in which related to publication ethics.
Peer reviewers:
1. Peer reviewers only agree to review manuscripts for which they have the subject expertise required to carry out a proper assessment and which they can assess in a timely manner.
2. Peer reviewers should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.
3. Peer reviewers should respect the confidentiality of data and not reveal any details of a manuscript or its review during or after the peer-review process, beyond those released by the journal.
4. Peer reviewers not use information obtained during the peer-review process for their own or any other person’s or organization’s advantage, or to disadvantage or discredit others.
5. Peer reviewers declare all potential conflicting interests, seeking advice from the journal if they are unsure whether something constitutes a relevant interest.
6. Peer reviewers not allow their reviews to be influenced by the origins of a manuscript, by the nationality, religious or political beliefs, gender or other characteristics of the authors, or by commercial considerations.
7. Peer reviewers must be objective and constructive in their reviews, refraining from being hostile or inflammatory and from making libelous or derogatory personal comments.
8. Peer reviewers should acknowledge that there is largely a reciprocal endeavor and undertake to carry out their fair share of reviewing and in a timely manner.
9. Peer reviewers provide personal and professional information that is accurate and a true representation of their expertise.
10. Peer reviewers recognize that impersonation of another individual during the review process considered serious misconduct.
